<ul id="q6cau"><sup id="q6cau"></sup></ul>
<ul id="q6cau"></ul>
<abbr id="q6cau"></abbr>
<strike id="q6cau"><menu id="q6cau"></menu></strike>
  • <ul id="q6cau"></ul>
  • The Annual Explosion Proof Electric Technology & Equipment Event
    logo

    The 25thChina International Explosion Protection and Electric Technology & Equipment Exhibition

    ufi

    BEIJING,CHINA

    March 26-28,2025

    LOCATION :Home> News > Industry News

    Nigeria demands $62 billion from oil majors for past profits

    Pubdate:2019-10-11 15:39 Source:liyanping Click:

    ABUJA (Bloomberg) - Nigeria is seeking to recover as much as $62 billion from international oil companies, using a 2018 Supreme Court ruling the state says enables it to increase its share of income from production-sharing contracts.

    The proposal comes as President Muhammadu Buhari tries to bolster revenue after a drop in the output and price of oil, Nigeria’s main export. It’s previously targeted foreign companies, fining mobile operator MTN Group Ltd. almost $1 billion for failing to disconnect undocumented SIM-card users, and suing firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a corruption scandal.

    In the latest plan, the government says energy companies failed to comply with a 1993 contract-law requirement that the state receive a greater share of revenue when the oil price exceeds $20 per barrel, according to a document prepared by the attorney-general’s office and the Justice Ministry. The document, seen by Bloomberg, was verified by the ministry.

    While the government hasn’t said how it will recover the money, it has said it wants to negotiate with the companies. In its battle with MTN, the fine imposed on the company was negotiated down from an initial penalty of $5.2 billion.

    Nigerian presidency spokesman Garba Shehu didn’t answer three phone calls or respond to a text message requesting comment.

    Under the production-sharing contract law, companies including Royal Dutch Shell Plc, ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA and Eni SpA agreed to fund the exploration and production of deep-offshore oil fields on the basis that they would share profit with the government after recovering their costs.

    When the law came into effect 26 years ago, crude was selling for $9.50 per barrel. The oil companies currently take 80% of the profit from these deep-offshore fields, while the government receives 20%, according to the document. Oil traded at $58.29 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe Exchange.

    Most of Nigeria’s crude is pumped by the five oil companies, which operate joint ventures and partnerships with the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.

    Representatives of the oil companies met Justice Minister Abubakar Malami Oct. 3 in the capital, Abuja, according to two people familiar with the discussions who asked not to be identified because the meeting wasn’t public. Malami told them that while no hostility is intended toward investors, the government will ensure all the country’s laws are respected, the people said.

    Ruling Challenged

    Oil companies including Shell have gone to the Federal High Court to challenge the government’s claim that they owe the state any money, arguing that the Supreme Court ruling doesn’t allow the government to collect arrears. They also contend that because the companies weren’t party to the 2018 case, they shouldn’t be subject to the ruling.

    “We do not agree with the legal basis for the claim that we owe outstanding revenues,” Shell’s Nigerian unit said in an emailed response to questions.

    Chevron spokesman Ray Fohr said the company doesn’t comment on matters before the court. Its units in Nigeria “comply with all applicable laws and regulations,” he said by email.

    Exxon and Total declined to comment, while Eni officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The Supreme Court ruling followed a lawsuit by states in Nigeria’s oil-producing region seeking interpretation of the nation’s production-sharing law. The states argued that they weren’t receiving their full due. The court ruled in their favor and asked the attorney general and justice minister to take steps to recover the outstanding revenue.

    The 1993 law required that its provisions be reviewed after 15 years and subsequently every five years. The attorney-general’s office insists that the provision for a higher share of revenue doesn’t require legislative action to take effect, according to the document.

    “Instead it imposes a duty on the oil companies and contracting parties, being NNPC, to by themselves review the sharing formula,” the ministry said.

    国产成人精品免费视| 日韩放荡少妇无码视频| 久久久亚洲精品视频| 国产精品亚洲视频| 亚洲日韩图片专区第1页| 精品无码成人久久久久久 | 国产精品一区在线播放| 无码囯产精品一区二区免费| 91视频国产精品| 日产国产精品亚洲系列| 手机看片福利永久国产日韩| 国产精品大全国产精品| 亚洲国产精品日韩在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线观看| 精品国产污污免费网站入口在线 | 国产在vr视频精品观看| 久青草中文字幕精品视频| 亚洲中文字幕无码日韩| 国产精品久久久久一区二区| 一区国产传媒国产精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久下载 | 国产精品无码2021在线观看| 国产精品大bbwbbwbbw| 2022国产精品手机在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费不卡| 国产精品天干天干在线综合| 亚洲AV日韩AV鸥美在线观看| 国产成人精品999在线| 精品国产AV色欲果冻传媒| 99亚洲乱人伦aⅴ精品| 久久久一本精品99久久精品36 | 精品久久久久久久无码久中文字幕| 97久久超碰国产精品2021| 91国内揄拍国内精品情侣对白| 99热精品久久只有精品30| 极品精品国产超清自在线观看| 日韩精品无码人成视频手机| 国产成人精品午夜二三区波多野 | 久久91精品国产91久久户| 国产成人无码精品久久久性色| 亚洲精品无码专区久久久|